Met Office dovrebbe nominare tempeste dopo le compagnie di combustibili fossili, affermano gli attivisti

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jun/26/met-office-should-name-storms-after-fossil-fuel-companies-say-campaigners

    di topotaul

    Share.

    9 commenti

    1. Commercial_Chef_1569 on

      Because storms didn’t exist before we discovered oil?

    2. antbaby_machetesquad on

      So…free advertising? What with the tossers at JSO alienating people with their antics, are we sure that most of these campaigners aren’t secretly funded by oil companies.

    3. LopsidedLegs on

      I can just see the headlines now:

      “Storm Exxon Mobil causes record rainfall resulting in Thames Water shitting into the Thames”.

    4. xylophileuk on

      Nah we should name the intensity after company’s

      Here is storm James coming currently at level Exxon but could hit full BP by the end of the week

    5. Objective_Mousse7216 on

      Or bad people. Storm Hitler, storm Stalin and storm Trump /s

    6. Dedsnotdead on

      Campaigners channelling PETA hard here. Let’s focus on investing in viable alternatives to fossil fuels at scale including base load.

      Then you can throw as much shade around as you want.

    7. limeflavoured on

      This is just performative nonsense, and they’re pretty clearly not going to do it.

    8. No-Argument-691 on

      So… The storms that happened before all these companies, how exactly did they happen?

    Leave A Reply