The author of this article has waited their entire working life to use that headline.
Difficult_Style207 on
Reform lied to get what they wanted? I’m shocked, shocked, I tell you.
ArchdukeToes on
>Martyn Sutton, Reform UK’s county councillor for Skerton, provided the following to The Lancashire Lead: “I can confirm that a social rather than political event was booked at Lancaster Brewery. “As a venue it can hold up to 400 people, can host a great BBQ and has undercover outdoor space if the weather is inclement.
>”It was not planned to be a closed event for Reform UK members and invitations were sent out to volunteers and supporters, as well as neighbouring branches.
>”As Reform UK won seven out of the 10 divisions at Lancaster Town Hall on May 1, it seems likely that a fair number of Lancaster Guardian readers could have been present.
I mean, the brewery has said they don’t take bookings for political parties, and this genius thinks that his argument makes a booking for Reform members, volunteers, and supporters *doesn’t* qualify because of the off chance that someone’s plus-one might not be a Reform voter?
3 commenti
The author of this article has waited their entire working life to use that headline.
Reform lied to get what they wanted? I’m shocked, shocked, I tell you.
>Martyn Sutton, Reform UK’s county councillor for Skerton, provided the following to The Lancashire Lead: “I can confirm that a social rather than political event was booked at Lancaster Brewery. “As a venue it can hold up to 400 people, can host a great BBQ and has undercover outdoor space if the weather is inclement.
>”It was not planned to be a closed event for Reform UK members and invitations were sent out to volunteers and supporters, as well as neighbouring branches.
>”As Reform UK won seven out of the 10 divisions at Lancaster Town Hall on May 1, it seems likely that a fair number of Lancaster Guardian readers could have been present.
I mean, the brewery has said they don’t take bookings for political parties, and this genius thinks that his argument makes a booking for Reform members, volunteers, and supporters *doesn’t* qualify because of the off chance that someone’s plus-one might not be a Reform voter?