Share.

6 commenti

  1. Consistent-Egg-3428 on

    I guess some people re against it as it’s an “unfair” way of hunting?

    I don’t know why it would be more fair to use only a gun and camouflage.

    Or is something else the issue?

  2. saberline152 on

    Silencers aren’t like those you see on TV or movies. Those also kinda exist with subsonic bullets, but those are, to my knowledge, not available to “regular” folk and hunters.

    Silencers can make the noise level from hearing damage to still loud but not as damaging. Even the simple standard difuser already does a lot.
    Stood next to a guy with an AR-15 at a range who took of the gas difuser from his gun, sounded like a cannon.

  3. SilenceBe on

    That politicians are safe even if most of them are like wild boars in a China shop: clumsy, ravenous, and blind to the damage they cause – as long as their bellies are full.

    It’ll no doubt end up being used against other animals too. And I don’t buy into all that romantic talk about hunting – if you need all those high-tech gadgets, how “fair” or noble is it really?

  4. Weer à la Belgique. Voor everzwijnen mag het en voor de rest niet. Kan iemand die logica uitleggen?

  5. Delicious_Wishbone80 on

    Everzwijnstoofvlees (met Geuze) is underrated net zoals een everzwijnbout boven een open vuur of gewoon in de oven. Ook heel lekker in de zomer.

  6. Hunters really are just a bunch of cowards thinking they are great at a sport that is anything but. Is there anything more unsportsmanlike than killing an animal from afar that does not even has the opportunity to defend itself?

    Now they are making it even easier. It disgusts me.

Leave A Reply