Share.

    17 commenti

    1. theyodeman on

      those are my principles and if you don’t like them, well I have others

    2. Remarkable_Battle614 on

      I wonder if this government can go a week without some sort of u-turn. They really *really* need to grow a spine

    3. They should put an image of a cirrhotic liver on every bottle or people throwing up blood / faeces as they die from liver failure or images of ascites. At least we’d all know what we’re risking

    4. ukstonerguy on

      Do beer companies really think we will forget about them? Take the win and save the money ffs. Not everything is a branding opportunity. 

    5. Optimaldeath on

      A few free suits, maybe a ticket to Oasis? The low standards is the true offence here.

    6. ukstonerguy on

      Plans to restrict the advertising of alcohol as part of the government’s 10-year plan for the NHS have been scrapped following widespread industry backlash.

      After a week of extensive lobbying from the industry and backlash from ministers, the Department for Health & Social Care has significantly watered down proposals to tackle alcohol-related harm.

      The 10 Year Health Plan, published in full on Thursday (3 July), contains no concrete commitment to introduce either HFSS-style restrictions on alcohol advertising pre-watershed and online. Nor does it include any mention of introducing minimum unit pricing in England.

      In fact, the only new measure included specifically to target alcohol-related harm is a “mandatory requirement for alcoholic drinks to display consistent nutritional information and health warning messages”.

      The warnings would “ensure greater public awareness of the health risks of alcohol consumption and help consumers make more informed, healthier choices”, the government’s 10-year plan said.

      Beyond measures to tackle alcohol-related harm, the government plans to consult on changing the upper strength threshold at which a drink may be described as alcohol-free to 0.5% abv, which would bring the UK in line with international standards. It will also “explore options to restrict access” to low & no-alcohol products to under-18s.

      Health warnings
      The Portman Group welcomed the government’s commitment to revisit alcohol-free descriptors, but said it didn’t believe there was a case for wider health warnings on packaging.

      “As the alcohol industry regulatory body for marketing, we ensure that adults who choose to drink have actionable and evidence-based information to make informed choices,” said CEO Matt Lambert. “The vast majority of alcohol products in the UK already carry our best practice standards including pregnancy warnings, unit information, the chief medical officer low-risk drinking guidelines, and a link to information from Drinkaware. The industry is also making great strides in adding calorie and other nutritional labelling to packaging.

      “We welcome the chance to work with government to further the uptake of low & no-alcohol alternatives as a useful tool to aid moderation, and clear up consumer confusion around product descriptors, including raising the alcohol-free threshold in line with our international peers for which we have long advocated.”

      Read more: Banning alcohol advertising would hammer Britain’s beleaguered booze industry
      “Aggressive lobbying” by alcoholic drinks suppliers had caused the government’s strategy to tackle alcohol harm to be “stripped”, said Jem Roberts, head of external affairs at the Institute of Alcohol Studies.

      “It’s frankly embarrassing to launch a ‘prevention’ plan that ignores the most effective ways to prevent alcohol harm,” said Roberts. “Deaths are at their highest level in decades and have risen over 40% in recent years – yet the government has dodged proven policies like minimum unit pricing, marketing restrictions, and availability controls.

      “Alcohol is the second-biggest cause of death and disability among working-age people. It hits the poorest hardest and drains the economy – costing nearly 180,000 working years in England alone. Prevention doesn’t just save lives, it supports economic growth by boosting productivity and freeing up money currently lost to harm.

      “We support clearer labelling, but it must be developed independently. The alcohol industry has kept people in the dark for years – and it has no place writing public health policy. If ministers can’t act now, we need a full independent review to cut through industry noise and deliver real change.”

    7. qwerty_1965 on

      This government’s fortitude is that of a bunch of people who believe in nothing other than being in power.

    8. bobblebob100 on

      Ah yea big corporate companies who buy smaller breweries and ruin them. Cant go upsetting them can we

    9. FoxyInTheSnow on

      Sure, why not. Get it onto cbeebies too. [This one captivated me when I was just learning how to talk](https://youtu.be/QHqxzv1wwaI?t=17) because I adored cartoons. You could have got me to sign up for Hitler Youth if its PR was handled by a jaunty, sea-shanty-singing cartoon Hitler.

    10. pajamakitten on

      Considering how much money alcohol costs society, especially with regards to the NHS, you would think the government would have a bigger backbone here. Then again, as with gambling and fast food, money talks louder and Labour will not want to pass up donations, staff secondments and sport/concerts tickets from alcohol companies.

    11. BaBaFiCo on

      Good. It was a stupid idea that demonised drinking and would cause huge damage to our struggling brewing and hospitality industries.

    12. Djinjja-Ninja on

      I’m sure there was a backlash from the tobacco companies as well when that ban was brought in, but it was still banned.

    13. Intrepid-Account743 on

      “Lobbying” sure…

      Couldn’t have anything to do with all that erudite, loquacious and PERSUASIVE money

    14. spinosaurs70 on

      We must allow people to market toxic metabolic waste products or else.

    15. qiaozhina on

      Alcohol advertising ban is one thing, but banning gambling advertising, at the very least before 9pm, should be on the table.

      I know watershed isn’t really a thing anymore but you can go pretty long before seeing an advertising for beer on the tv, but you can have gambling advertised to you from the moment you wake up depending on the channel. Bingo and gambling websites for daytime tv, sports betting for any sport you watch and sprinkled around…

    16. goodtitties on

      centrists really wanna seem sensible and pragmatic but they always just end up conceding more and more to business and right wing interests. it isn’t sensible or smart to keep giving your wallet to the wallet inspector

    17. notouttolunch on

      I’m not sure I really remember any alcohol advertising. I remember a small pony thing for babycham. A nice song for Concorde… A stupid bird for Famous Grouse at Christmas.

      So many of the alcohol brands are decades old and advertising is more a tradition than anything. I’d be more keen to see gambling advertising banned as that’s not something that’s dwindling as the generations move on.

    Leave A Reply