Close Menu
    Europa

    Siti del patrimonio mondiale dell’UNESCO per paese, a partire da luglio 2025

    Share.
    View 9 Comments

    9 commenti

    1. Individual-Repair208 on

      As a Canadian with zero ties to my heritage and around average knowledge of history, it is strange to me that we have more sites than Greece of all places

      Edit: ahhh natural sites, everything makes a lot more sense now

    2. BlueBucket0 on

      While some counties obviously do have an abundance of sites suitable for UNESCO, I think some are also just very slow about pushing their sites forward for consideration.

    3. tilohvasya on

      no way russia has more than Turkey or Greece. Calling the bs

    5. gcreptile on

      I think the list is actually -mostly- fine. I kind of think my own country -germany- is slightly overrepresented, but then, we do take care of our monuments. It’s not just about having had history, but also how you deal with it. And Europe had the most natural modernization whereas in, say, China, lots of old stuff has been bulldozed down for progress. Also, you have to want the heritage site, which is why, say, the Empire State Building isn’t one.

    6. IamMefisto-theDevil on

      Hmm…

      Romania has 17 sites.

      There are some problems with this graph!

    7. Beyllionaire on

      You need to lobby to get the recognition anyway. So this is just a list of which countries lobbied the hardest.

    8. Jazzlike_Note1159 on

      Turkey would have more heritage sites if we knew how to promote them better and UNESCO wasnt such a west-centric organisation! Like Iran and Turkey has combined less than France?

    9. Nolenag on

      The United States and Japan having the same amount is laughably stupid.

    Leave A Reply