About time a proper sentence was handed out, but why are they so inconsistent? If rape is proven there should be mandatory minimum. Regardless of circumstances.
Imaginary-Taste-2744 on
Why is it that the person convicted of rape is not named?
Why does it have to be both names or no names.
Calm-Tension7576 on
The only people getting proper jail time are for sex offences – lots of other violent crimes getting suspended or short sentences
mslowey on
It’s a disgrace that it took 6 years for this to come before the courts and justice to be served. The poor victim having to endure that wait.
Isaidahip on
Jail them all and stop importing more
slamjam25 on
> The man was arrested and interviewed, and while he initially denied there was any contact between them, he was re-arrested following DNA analysis. He then accepted that if anything had happened, he had been asleep at the time and could not offer any further explanation.
This guy got a discount on his sentence for pleading guilty mind you
9 commenti
[removed]
Where was he from?
[deleted]
About time a proper sentence was handed out, but why are they so inconsistent? If rape is proven there should be mandatory minimum. Regardless of circumstances.
Why is it that the person convicted of rape is not named?
Why does it have to be both names or no names.
The only people getting proper jail time are for sex offences – lots of other violent crimes getting suspended or short sentences
It’s a disgrace that it took 6 years for this to come before the courts and justice to be served. The poor victim having to endure that wait.
Jail them all and stop importing more
> The man was arrested and interviewed, and while he initially denied there was any contact between them, he was re-arrested following DNA analysis. He then accepted that if anything had happened, he had been asleep at the time and could not offer any further explanation.
This guy got a discount on his sentence for pleading guilty mind you