Share.

    7 commenti

    1. John_Williams_1977 on

      Won’t that take the fun out of the Notting Hill crime carnival?

    2. limeflavoured on

      >LFR was trialled at the carnival in 2016 and 2017 but was ditched after it wrongly flagged 102 people as potential suspects.

      Unless the tech has substantially improved then what’s the point?

    3. Sensitive_Echo5058 on

      The problem with NHC is that too many people attend.

      Every bank holiday weekend is a nightmare in that area. It’s not just that it attracts criminals – it’s the people urinating on your front door or littering that makes it unpleasant for some local residents.

    4. Virtual-Feedback-638 on

      How about doing that at Wimbledon, Grand National, Football matches, etc?

    5. nasrudin45 on

      Whether it’s effective or not, it seems that live facial recognition could be coming to more public places in London soon. Already being trialled for tube stations to catch fare dodgers, apparently:

      [https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/facial-recognition-cameras-fare-dodging-tube-london-underground-tfl-b1237049.html](https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/facial-recognition-cameras-fare-dodging-tube-london-underground-tfl-b1237049.html)

      Is there any sort of consultancy / legal hurdles for implementing this sort of surveillance?

    6. Cpt_TomMoores_jacuzi on

      Oh goody, that’s not dystopian at all… perhaps we could have some sort of system where you get, I dunno, credit or something, for behaving like the government want you to and we could like tie it to whether people can access goods and services… that seems like a great way to a healthy society!

    7. Facial recognition and government control over what you can see on the Internet

      What could go wrong

    Leave A Reply