Share.

    32 commenti

    1. Feisty-Witness-3972 on

      Italian here: as much as I dislike Meloni, the EU’s position on the migratory crisis is basically “it is an EU problem and common effort is requested, in the meantime Italy please take care of it.” Migrants are fertile ground for populism, and by doing this the EU is basically doing a favor to far-rights all over the EU.

    2. mschuster91 on

      Yet another far right leader discovers that, unlike in the times of the Führer, yes there are limits to one’s power.

      I just hope the court won’t eventually relent similar to how they relented in IP connection data storage (“Vorratsdatenspeicherung”), because that is what these authoritarian fucks game for.

    3. Legatus_Aemilianus on

      I’m very pro-eu but surely the idea of a court comprised of non-Italians, making rulings on domestic *Italian* law, is a serious threat to the sovereignty of Italy, no?

    4. TheoryOfDevolution on

      Yeah, this is only going to fuel anti-EU sentiment.

    5. eraser3000 on

      For those salivating at the thought of whatever, the matter was in the hands of the Italian court that escalated it to the European court of justice. AFAIK the Italian court was already of the same opinion of the ecj

    6. Germanicus15BC on

      This is what Brexit voters wanted to get away from…..but even that didn’t stop uncontrolled mass immigration.

    7. No-Adhesiveness-4251 on

      I love seeing people talk about restricting the EU courts as if we don’t need those same courts to prevent shit like chatcontrol from becoming a permanent feature of the EU.

      Stop making it easier to strip yourselves of your basic rights.

    8. Soepkip43 on

      Courts use applicable law. So if they want this they need to change the law.

    9. cstras23 on

      Kinda wild that a collection of people from other countries get to decide what a sovereign nation can and can’t do

    10. Diagoras21 on

      There will be a day the terms asylum seeker and refugee will be scrapped in the law books.

    11. Adorable-Ad3009 on

      While I don’t necessarily agree with this decision, it’s worth noticing that it is based on a quite clear law.
      I am inclined to think that the EU is letting the ECJ do the dirty work, while lacking the political will to actually change the european immigration framework, which is, in my opinion, quite an urgent matter.

    12. Banewolf on

      Fascist Barbie Meloni can get fucked with a Sandpaper D*ldo!

    13. Dracogame on

      This is what happens when the government is incompetent and promises illegal solutions to a problem they can’t fix.

      Now they can blame Europe for their own shortcomings.

    14. Emotional_Pay3658 on

      What would happen if Italy said fuck you and did it anyways?

    15. daiaomori on

      I also fume a lot, lately.

      Not because of the EUGH, though, but because of all the Nazi pricks in power.

    16. thebolddane on

      So the EU court agrees with what the Italian court finds but it’s a “power grab”? Secondly these verdicts are based on law, if you disagree provide a legal argument. When saying a country is safe, provide evidence, they seem to have failed both in Italy itself and now in Strasbourg.

    17. No-Count-7717 on

      These courts who appoint these people? It seems to only be positive for corporations who can exploit workers and keep wages low, keep house expensive

    18. Zhelthan on

      I was always pro asylum seekers. What we have is imported criminals. I work on daily basis with asylum seeker they are not the same thing.

    19. YakDue6821 on

      As a romanian, in 2022, former google employee in Munich, after 7 years I checked the possibility of german citizenship path because it was easier to have trips to USA (required by job, not because I ever wanted to move or have anything to do with USA), illegal migrants without even knowing the language were actually favored and offered a way easier path to that with less years spent in the country and without speaking the language or even knowing anything about european history or culture. I’m sorry but you guys create your own path to extremist governments.

    20. No_Regret_9475 on

      Ofcourse those who don’t have to live with the consequences chose the most idiotic thing possible

    21. I_write_you_read on

      the EU judges which are here to defend European democracy will be the first cause of European implosion, leading to the end of democracies…

    22. AsianWinnieThePooh on

      Same country that arrested a YouTuber for using an emulator?

    23. Title is incredibly misleading.

      The EU basically says, you have to actually follow the rules laid out, not just make shit up.

      But I’m sure r/europe won’t immediatly leap on it as “this will only help the far right”

    24. ScotsDale213 on

      “The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) said EU nations may only create national lists of safe countries outside the bloc if they fully justify their assessments with public sources.

      According to the court, a country can only be considered “safe” for repatriation if “the entire population” is protected across all regions.”

      So…. If you want to repatriate asylum seekers outside the EU you need to prove using public sources that you are not sending them to a place they are likely to be harmed. Seems reasonable enough to me. As much as people might not like asylum seekers, sending them into a death trap is definitely not good.

    Leave A Reply