Share.

    11 commenti

    1. Zealousideal_Clue857 on

      Was it a blind taste test?

      Edit: you should redo it two or fifteen times just to be sure.

    2. TheOneTrueZippy8 on

      Who – I say **who** – is drinking these things for the ***taste*** ?

    3. Good content. This is sort of a post that would be paywalled on Iltalehti and Iltasanomat. People love comparative reviews.

    4. eddythebeagle on

      I agree. Karlens is best of the light lonkeros I have “tested” so far.

    5. notacomet on

      Sorry for the dumb question – I work for a US-based version of this drink and I’m visiting Finland for a week in a few days. Why are these considered “light”? They are over 5% abv so they wouldn’t be considered a light drink here.

      Edit: I meant this mostly because I don’t know off of the top of my head any no sugar or low sugar cans that have above 5% abv. Beer here is called light, but not canned seltzers or cocktails.

    6. Chiparish84 on

      Are those others considered as real Long Drink? As made from Gin and not by fermentation?

    7. Novel_Opportunity_54 on

      I’d prefer Koff long drinks, way better than any of those.

    8. Jorma_Molo on

      Pirkka greippilonkero light 4,7% (blue can) is tasty, but the nearest K-market don’t have it.

    9. NeuralFantasy on

      Nice! But do it again and repeat the bild test and use statistical methods to see if the result is statistically significant or just pure randomness.

    10. FAS-ACA3 on

      Hartwall is good but 18e for a 6pack ain’t really enticing

    11. huopasalmiakki on

      I was so shure next picture would be all in thrasbin.

    Leave A Reply