Come outsider l’ho trovato un’opera d’arte interessante alla prima apparizione. Quando ho esaminato la sua storia e ciò che rappresentava, capisco la ragione della sua rimozione. La maggior parte dei lettoni moderni concordano sul fatto che avrebbe dovuto essere distrutti?

    https://i.redd.it/cttp8c998ngf1.jpeg

    di thestinkybeastman

    Share.

    5 commenti

    1. skalpelis on

      It wasn’t the relatively small lady statue that was the problem, it was the giant obelisk towering over the whole park that’s out of frame in this image.

      Either your “research” is sorely lacking or you’re just trolling

    2. fatty_lumpkn on

      Absolutely, yes. I grew up in Latvia and although I am ethnically Russian, I completely agree that it should have been removed. Both Soviets and Nazis committed horrible atrocities in Latvia and statues commemorating either side is a slap in the face.

    3. AlbertWin on

      Could have been removed and placed in storage or museum, but that mby was not possible due to size. But it should not have been left as is.

    4. They can’t really have an actual impact on anything so they do shit like this and pretend it has an effect on anything at all

      Let them have their fun, in any way it is meaningless

    Leave A Reply