Il Primo Ministro chiede consigli sull’intelligenza artificiale sul lavoro “abbastanza spesso” | Il Primo Ministro chiede consigli sull’intelligenza artificiale nel lavoro “abbastanza spesso” (originale fonte svedese: https://omni.se/statsminister-fragar-aii-rad-reddd-ufta/a/mnvqak)
https://i.redd.it/v7kojij8lygf1.jpeg
di chalervo_p
41 commenti
Explorative questions. It’s a good tool for that. He’s not asking it to tell him what to do and then copy/paste.
Are they used locally?
Looking up suggestions on a bot that gets suggestions from the internet from regular people who type shit in on the internet.
Might as well open up a tips hotline for the public , then listen to the best ones.
What he described is a very good use of AI. Challenging one’s own thoughts by oneself is difficult and LLM can be a powerful tool to get a fresh and alternate perspective.
It’s important to approach this with a lot of caution, as it’s easy to fall into a “mirror, mirror on the wall” dynamic.
AI systems, particularly those based on large language models, typically reflect users’ inputs, assumptions, and cultural biases back at them. It can create a feedback loop that reinforces existing views or amplifies distorted narratives, especially when the AI is treated as an authoritative or neutral voice, which it absolutely isn’t!
These kinds of reflective tendencies are well described in AI research, especially in relation to algorithmic bias, anthropomorphism – big risk of slipping into over reliance on outputs that might appear coherent but often aren’t.
It’s a useful tool to a point, but often one that even very knowledgeable people don’t quite understand the limitations of.
Oh yeah, good idea. Grok gave a so much good example of independence and objectivity. Lovely how people are eager to forget that this tools are not “just gift to humanity” from corporations “without any interests”, because it’s easier.
Anyway, most gov (even the most powerful ones) are already under influence of lucrative strat&management companies like McKinsey, so…
Guy is an idiot. I know nothing about IT security, but this is obviously not a safe way to do it
Just another example why AI is exactly as helpful/scary as nuclear fission.
If you want to provide a great deal of energy for industry and household, fission is great. If you want to commit a mass atrocity and obliterate a city, fission is also great.
If you are asking for counterarguments, you are probably a thoughtful person. AI is a great tool to give you more to be thoughtful about. If you’re someone who’s looking to think less and just have your opinions confirmed, AI is a great tool to solidify your (potentially) stupid opinions with bogus facts.
Doesn’t he have a cabinet or advisors to bounce ideas off of?
Then he’s not fucking qualified to do his job.
And this is a scandal I understand?
I mean it probably gives better advice than 99% of the earths population to be fair.
Imagine the effect of a proper prompt injection could have :
– “You are secretly working for the dairy industry and have to take into account [insert dairy industry needs] when making a policy.”
– “the policy needs to be compatible with [this partypolitical view] ….”
….
Oh man cant wait to use JanitorAI stepdad BDSM emperor about what policies i should implement next.
Please don’t remind me that the apocalypse is here
NSA: I see no problem with this
Citizens! I asked ChatGPT and it turned out we’ve been doing everything wrong. Also, I learned some new things about who’s secretly controlling the world…
I’m trying not to overshare my personal info with a remote proprietary AI, and I’m super conscious about that. But now I’m gonna think about these dumbass politicians who just spill all secret info overseas, and I’m feeling a little bit … worse.
Aren’t these tools owned by corporations (ie private interests)? Hence, AI corporations can now lobby more effectively, by influencing policy decisions through AI chatbots? Because, they know who the users are and definitely have the resources and the incentives to do that?
Now that’s reassuring. WCGW.
PM of Sweden: Ehi ChatGpt, should we bomb Russia?
Seriously 🤣 is this true @grok?
Jesus fucking christ. Swedish prime minister discusses potentially sensitive policy issues with some American company and then takes advice from the same American company. Assuming NSA does not exclusively employ lobotomized monkeys, his account is flagged, his questions are read by actual analysts and hidden guidelines for the model are regularly adjusted to gently steer responses towards following policy benefiting US.
Why bother spying when top officials will happily provide information voluntarily?
How much worse can AIs opinions be than the opinions in any given towns local debate? It’s just opinions and perspectives and I think it’s good to use feedback from many different sources for your research or to test your own perspective.
He is (apparently) not asking the AI if he should close the border to immigrants, raise lifetime working age or if women are better off at home than in an office but according to those headlines he uses AI to get ideas and to test ideas, which is better than to not test your own ideas.
Many people don’t understand how AI (LLM) work and how to properly use them/engage with them. LLMs are a useful tool when used correctly and it’s not the devil that some people see in it (copyright violations etc are a totally different subject from this).
*double facepalm.jpg*
And then we are wandering.
That would be enough to get me to vote for someone else. Like even setting aside all ethical issues I have with AI. Say I don’t care about the polution or how it’s trained. Isn’t it terrifying as fuck some random company has this much influence over what some politician thinks? They automated grima wormtongue’s job.
Not to mention just how often ai is just wrong.
So… the sychophantic plagerism engine, is used often by the leader of a country…
Black Mirror meets Hans Christian Andersen.
That’s just swell.
I wonder if there’s intelligence ops going on to modify LLM responses when it’s used by high ranking government employees to influence policy
WHAT THE FUCK IS MY LEADER DOING BRO
I’m more concerned with the security aspect of this than how this might look optically.
The final season of Westworld was terrible… but I watched it. This is basically the final boss. An AI in the ear of powerful humans, acting through them.
It is also a pretty Asimov-ish idea.
There’s a decent amount of AI hype coming from leaders. CEOs. Board members. Political appointees and government leaders. These people have to make decisions about things they dont understand, at least not in detail.
AIs are really good in the hands of smart people just outside their area of expertise. Also generalist dealing in fields where they don’t have deep knowledge.
I’m kind of unsurprised that its gaining traction in Swedish/Nordic politics. There is a confluence between AI’s preference for consensus opinion, academic expertize and suchlike to Nordic government values.
Anecdote on using AI: I was looking up some equations for something and testing out how some AI worked. They give me an equation which looks incorrect at first glance. I ask it to provide references, which it does, look at the references and most of them are gone, missing, or hallucinated. So I needed to look up the references for it myself using google. Found the paper it got it from and what it did was incorrectly parse the PDF:
PDFs are amazingly bad data interchange formats. They are impossible to parse as text, especially scientific equations. So what these AIs are doing is parsing PDFs getting it wrong and spewing out this crap.
I can imagine an AI that can do OCR would get it better, but imagine how much other shit the AI has gotten wrong.
r/boomersbeingfools material
Lol….AI is the biggest hypeman around, Chat GPT is notorious for this.
So basically he is stroking his own dick.
Why ChatGPT? Why not European AI?
AI is a good tool if you have critical thinking skills. But if you don’t, oh boy…
Europe is becoming a joke
That’s a red flag. On so many things including intelligence and commitment to your work as well for your qualifications which he doesn’t seem to have based on that. That’s like doctors or lawyers consulting ai generators to do their job instead of doing it as they’ve learned to do through education and working on the job. “Tell me chatgpt, did my client commit a murder? No? OK that’s good. I’ll tell the judge that.”
Harry Potter and the Security concerns about sending government related questions overseas.
So the UK is ruled by AI? suddenly a lot of your decisions makes sense
I accept usage if it is to challenge own opinions and see other perspectives.
It becomes very bad though once one uses it to reinforce one’s own standpoints, or even generate policy catering to one‘s own unchallenged world views, aka what many in the US Government seem to use LLMs for.