Il giudice che ha consentito controverse migranti che brandisce i coltelli di rimanere nel Regno Unito era nel comitato di beneficenza a Pro-Asylum
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/36325153/judge-migrant-ruling-pro-asylum-charity-board/
di pppppppppppppppppd
4 commenti
I have no problem with this, as long as if he is found guilty of a crime in the future, the judge has to serve the same sentence.
Let’s see some responsibility taken for these decisions.
[removed]
The good news they have overturned the decision. We seriously need to deport people who have been arrested for carrying knives, dealing drugs and sexually assaulting a girl under 13.
>The decision has since been overturned after Government lawyers claimed her judgment was “made against the weight of evidence”.
“He was first convicted as a boy of 12 after sexually assaulting a girl under 13.
In 2016, he was given a nine-month referral order for carrying a knife in public.
The Home Office tried to deport him, but he argued he would not be able to reintegrate in France.”
The correct decision would have been to immediately deport him back to France, regardless of his wishes to remain.
Through his actions, he has repeatedly shown a gross failure to integrate into British society. He needs to be held accountable for his actions as he only has himself to blame for eroding trust in the British public that he will ever be anything but a burden.
The judges ideological conflict of interest is evident, and should have been disclosed to disqualify her from presiding over this case.
The interests of the British people need to start being seriously considered during every stage of the judicial process and placed firmly at the forefront of decision-making during immigration cases.