Close Menu
    Svizzera

    Atterraggio verticale fallito di F -35b – Quanto stiamo pagando di nuovo per questi?

    Share.
    View 12 Comments

    12 commenti

    1. yesat on

      We’ve never considered buying the F35B, this was during the test phase of the airplane.

      And do you know how many helicopters crashes.

    2. Vast_Bullfrog2001 on

      well, considering we’re buying the F-35A, which lacks VTOL capabilities, we don’t have to worry about this!
      and either way, every aircraft will have it’s failures and defects

    3. Carbonaraficionada on

      Realistically, are these really what we want? Between the possibility of being remotely disabled, the overall cost, and the number that have been lost/destroyed already, is this really the best option if we’re getting put under a 39% tariff?

    6. DVUZT on

      Probably nothing, because we’re not buying the F35B with STOVL capabilities 🙃.

      How about we leave the discussion to experts and not some Reddit socialists, greens and students.

    7. InterruptingCow-Moo on

      Should probably educate yourself before ragebaiting

    8. CopiumCatboy on

      Uh that‘s the B model and I’m pretty sure the bums in charge, who inexplicably still have heads on their shoulders, want the A variant, which can‘t do VTOL.

    10. GiveMeAnAlgorithm on

      And this post shows you lack even basic understanding and why you shouldn’t yell before thinking 🙂

      Folks, you need to stop thinking you know it better, than those that work and evaluate those things professionally.

    11. Usheraz on

      Comparing the F-35B doing a vertical landing to a F-35A (the one we’re getting) makes as much sense as comparing the F-35C failing to land on an aircraft carrier. These are 3 different variant and they just have a common base/design

    Leave A Reply