Il Regno Unito “deve affrontare disordini sociali” se il lavoro spinge avanti con la definizione dell’islamofobia
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/uk-social-unrest-labour-islamophobia-definition-dk9dvrmrt
di Hadatopia
Il Regno Unito “deve affrontare disordini sociali” se il lavoro spinge avanti con la definizione dell’islamofobia
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/uk-social-unrest-labour-islamophobia-definition-dk9dvrmrt
di Hadatopia
11 commenti
[removed]
Labour need to rake in the Muslim vote. It will be defined, and labour will call anyone that disagrees with it an islamaphobic racist.
Labour doesn’t care about blasphemy, Labour cares about votes, and that’s the driving force as they know the muslim vote is rapidly growing
Blasphemy laws are attempting a comeback in the year 2025, aren’t we lucky that Labour are doing this only to take back the Muslim vote after haemorrhaging them due to the Gaza debacle.
[removed]
[removed]
Looking at the current state of the economy, and that Labour are too busy trying to appease Reform voters to actually tackle the economic issues, frankly I think Labour are actively trying to cause social unrest.
It’ll certainly help them with their push to curb personal freedoms and online privacy if it were to all kick off.
Labour could get massive amounts of the Muslim vote if they condemned the literal genocidal actions of Israel but instead they will add blasphemy laws which alienates the other side of the voter base just for a tiny increase in the Muslim vote, less than if they condemned literal war crimes.
Lmao Kier Starmer is a fucking moron
[removed]
Mate, at this point every issue the right wing go on about “risks social disorder”.
Someone somewhere really wants you to riot. And it’s not the Kaiser Chiefs this time.
I suggest instead a peaceful democracy where various views are respected and individuals’ rights are valuable.
There should be no laws that stop criticism of religion, any religion.
There are already laws to stop people threatening other people. They should be enough. Discussion should never be censored.
Just remember that various religions in the past have stood against, vaccinations, blood transfusions, organ donation, contraception, and even anaesthetics is on a very long list.
If we had laws back in the day to stop criticism of religion maybe we won’t have all those things.
Criticism of imaginary friends and their application in the real world is not a crime in the UK any longer and never should be again. Centuries of murder, torture, and mutilation for questions or criticism of the Abrahamic cults are not so far behind us. Other areas of the world still have real-life implications for such actions. Let us move forwards not in reverse.