Share.

    13 commenti

    1. ByGollie on

      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Norway is increasingly suffering by staying out of the EU as Donald Trump’s tariff wars and Brexit make trade policy more important, the country’s foreign minister and his main rival said ahead of Monday’s parliamentary election.
      >
      > Norway is part of the EU’s single market through its membership of the European Economic Area (EEA) but is not part of the bloc’s trade policy or customs union after twice voting No to joining in referendums.
      >
      > “We are acutely aware that the delta between EU membership and EEA membership is increasing,” said Espen Barth Eide, Norway’s foreign minister. His centre-left Labour party is the slight favourite ahead of the vote but polls remain too close to call.
      >
      > Ine Eriksen Søreide, a former foreign minister who would likely regain her position if her centre-right opposition party wins the most seats, said: “Everyone sees that our connection with the EU gives us a lot of vulnerabilities, because we are increasingly on the outside of everything we want to be on the inside of.”
      >
      > Both the Labour party and Søreide’s Conservatives want Norway to join the EU but neither want to call for a new referendum imminently, as opinion polls show most voters reject membership of the bloc.
      >
      > She stressed that the cost of not being in the EU was increasing “by the day”, adding: “That has to do with everything from Brexit to the war [in Ukraine] to the pandemic to the refugee crisis — which changes the EU fundamentally in how they work, and how they work with third countries.”
      >
      >
      > Norwegian opposition politicians have criticised the government for getting worse tariff terms than the EU with the US, despite Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre’s friendly meeting with Trump in the White House in April.
      >
      > Norway is the closest non-member country to the EU and its biggest supplier of gas after replacing Russia following the latter’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
      >
      > Norway’s two-party coalition collapse in January underscored how divisive the EU remains, when the junior partner, the rural Centre party, refused to back the entry of various EU energy directives. The Labour party passed them with the help of other parties.
      >
      > But energy policy is likely to remain a thorn in the side of Norway’s relationship with the EU in the next parliament. Støre said this week that if he led a new government Norway would not implement the remaining five parts of the EU’s clean energy package.
      >
      > Barth Eide said Norway — a big electricity, oil and gas provider — wanted more input on the regulations. He added that the current government was trying to speed up implementation of other EU directives and regulations and ‘‘demonstrate our strict adherence to the principles of the EEA”.
      >
      > An additional complication in the Norway-EU relationship is likely to come next year and in 2027 when two old electricity interconnectors to Denmark come up for renewal.
      >
      > Sylvi Listhaug, leader of the rightwing populist Progress party which is currently second in the polls, said that she did not want to renew them because Denmark — an EU member state — was so reliant on renewable energy such as wind power.
      >
      > She added that Norway provided the EU with about 60 times more gas than electricity so she would prioritise the former for the 27-country bloc and try to keep power prices low in Norway.
      >
      > “If we export so much to Europe that the prices are high at home, that gives us problems,’’ she said. ‘‘We are a cold country so we need to have electricity.”
      >

    2. Ninevehenian on

      I don’t feel like having Fremskittspartiet become a larger part of EU.

    3. The EU energy market regulations and systems are.. they’re not great. 

      There is a lot of “ideological” path dependence at play, after decades of climate solutions becam camps. 

      Now, finally at the precipice of a green transition… these wonkish camps are entrenched and energy policy frameworks are rigid. 

      There was an incident last December where a combination of rare market conditions and automated rulesets triggered a massive electricity price spike and Norway had to pull out of agreements as an emergency measure.

    4. Own_Kaleidoscope1287 on

      Ive never understood why its so hard for the Norwegian or Swedish government to put a tax on electricity exports. This would reduce the incentive for their energy companies to export to other countries + would generate revenue to subsidise the electricity price at home.

      Looks like a win win to me, the only ones losing would be the shareholders of the electricity companies as their profits would decrease.

    5. Willing-Donut6834 on

      I’m not gonna lie. The Nobel price is going to be a reason for Trump to put a lot of pressure on Norway in the future. They have to be ready for their sovereignty on Arctic territories to be challenged.

    6. Uat_Da_Fak on

      We need them, they need us. I know about the failed union with the Danes, but get over it. The timing is not right for any division. We are under attack.

    7. elderrion on

      They have a the full prerogative to choose in or out, as much as I’m a flag waving European, both options are valid, especially since I’m one of the people in favour of reforms before expansion (for the replacement of vetoes by QMV), however I would recommend that the discussion surrounding the decision should be increasingly put on the forefront. There’s ups and there’s downs, but the people can’t make in informed decision if you keep going off on the notion that everything’s been said before. It hasn’t. 

    8. Professional_Fix4056 on

      a disadvantage that they themselves caused by implementing too many EU directives and regulations.

      so.. it looks like a cozy retirement on the french riviera is off the table for these politicians

    9. Headpuncher on

      # Article headline is misleading: neither of the people quoted in the article use the word ‘disadvantaged’.

      “Disadvantaged” comes directly from the Financial Times editorial (a conservative news source).

      The people quoted talk about “vulnerabilities” of being outside the EU during a period of uncertainty in relation to third countries (which Norway is not, a third country in this sense is outside the EU and outside of the EEA, for example with no Schengen agreement). Vulnerabilities equates to uncertainties and refers specifically the war in Ukraine, and then they talk about the bullshit EU electricity market that has screwed over Norwegian consumers, which incidentally Vond der Leyen the head of the EU has publicly stated is a system that does not work and needs rethinking. I believe she said something akin to “the economists got it wrong”.

      This is FT FUD (Fear uncertainty and Doubt).

    10. CookieChoice5457 on

      Cries in Norwegian oil and gas money, selling into a market that was dependent on Russian oil and gas for decades and will mow pay premium for your oil and gas…
      Yeah, Norway, the Qatar of the north really is at a disadvantage.

    11. QuestGalaxy on

      Yet AP (Labour) does not want us in EU, even though they know it’s a disadvantage for us.

    Leave A Reply