Il plotter della bomba dell’arena di Manchester rifiuta di lasciare la cella in tribunale
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz089jg79npo
di GnolRevilo
Il plotter della bomba dell’arena di Manchester rifiuta di lasciare la cella in tribunale
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz089jg79npo
di GnolRevilo
8 commenti
Should be a law that we can drag them in by their ballsack if we have to. The victims got no say in their untimely demise so why does this speccy pedo stash scrote get a say?
Given that he is already serving the longest ever non-whole life sentence, I’d be interested what the sentence for 3 additional counts of attempted murder is. If one if the victims had died its as near as makes no difference an automatic whole life order.
Good. Less work for prison officers transporting him, less strain on security for court officials. He’s saving us money and his case will proceed without him.
It’s surreal a country that has existed for centuries has absolutely no strategy for someone saying ‘no’.
I refuse to believe, in 1,000 years, this has never occurred before and we didn’t plan a response then.
There are reforms underway to empower judges to compel prisoners to attend, and sanction them if they refuse (including sanctions that would affect their access to facilities in prison, not only additional jail time). This was introduced under Sunak’s government, and supported by Starmer’s. This article from 4 months ago sets out the basics, but I don’t know how much his has progressed.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/may/07/criminals-england-wales-sanctions-refusing-to-attend-sentencing
Nothing there about dragging them into court by the scrotum though, so many will find it disappointing.
Our local cat A prison used to pay my colleague (or pay the hospital for him) to do an NHS dermatology clinic occasionally as it was cheaper to pay that than the cost of taking them to hospital apps. Many prisoners would refuse to leave their cells for appointments they literally requested.
Choices are freedom. Freedom was abandoned. What’s the confusion here?
What would the Islamic law he loves so much do? Why don’t we give him the treatment the ideology he supportswould do? Medieval punishment at it’s most inventive.
Wouldn’t respecting his religion in this way be the respectful thing to do instead of imposing our infidel liberal values on him?