L’Irlanda vuole una backdoor di crittografia, ma gli esperti di privacy sollecitano le autorità a “riconsiderare i loro piani”
https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/ireland-wants-an-encryption-backdoor-but-privacy-experts-urge-authorities-to-reconsider-their-plans
di SnooSquirrels7521
20 commenti
If governments have a backdoor it’s only a matter of time before bad actors have it too.
is this once again one of those attempts to “unlock” AI training data?
That’s What’s up with Justice Ministers in EU lately…
Another day another episode of europe wanting to become china.
>This is the pledge from a coalition of privacy experts, including over 30 signatories among civil society organizations, companies, and cybersecurity experts, including members of the Global Encryption Coalition.
We need to know who these people and groups are. It’s funny how they get to remain anonymous.
Edit: Guess I should’ve putting in the /s? 😂
They will put chat control back on the menu as soon as it’s their presidency’s turn (July 2026)
We’ve had the same debate and we’ve been going back and forth on this for the last 20 years. I’ve read the same headline every month since the smartphone first appeared.
I think it’s naiive to think real governments (Ireland isn’t one, after all) DON’T already sufficient access to our communications.
I’m Irish. No shade. Just me being Irish
Encryption isn’t the problem, lazy cybersecurity and mass data leaks are. Government just don’t like walls they can’t climb
I think Ireland might actually be the imposter in the EU.
More politicians who do not even understand what the word encryption means.
The Irish *government* want this, not the Irish people. Let’s be clear.
None of the parties in the current government got more than about 20% of the vote in the last general election, but two who got about the same formed a coalition with some independents.
They’ve been rivals since the formation of their respective parties – people would have voted for one or the other in the past. So the current government has a very shaky mandate to begin with.
alcoholics.. what a surprise.. drunked heads can see one step away.. second step is – when you have a backdoor, all bad parties will have it too in short time
Not even our crazy ass government is trying this. Why does this policy movement exist in Europe?
“How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man!”
People without a clue in the governments say these things. They dont understand the ramifications of what they ask.
Ministers and EU members of parliament all have replied with different text whe contacted . Some with very shallow understanding, some with a good understanding.
An examples from the ministers of justices office.
“Negotiations are on-going for this proposal, and the current text around detection orders and end-to-end-encrypted (E2EE) services specifies that in the instance where a detection order is issued to a provider who uses E2EE, the provider is required to detect the dissemination of CSAM prior to its transmission in the encrypted channel.”
This is not a “debate” as much as shape of the Earth is not a debate.
This is a bunch of illiterate cretins arguing against reality.
I hate the politics in my country at times. They’re always so complacent and believe in their plans. Can’t backfire not needing precautions and worse they don’t get to suffer the consequences of it.
Any laws like this should always ONLY apply to politicians the first ten years. Only after that should they be allowed to extend it out. Not this “we’re exempt “ crap.