L’agenzia anticrimine del Regno Unito sostiene il piano di “prevenzione dei caricamenti” per la scansione dei messaggi crittografati
https://reclaimthenet.org/jess-phillips-supports-message-scanning-to-protect-children-online
di 457655676
L’agenzia anticrimine del Regno Unito sostiene il piano di “prevenzione dei caricamenti” per la scansione dei messaggi crittografati
https://reclaimthenet.org/jess-phillips-supports-message-scanning-to-protect-children-online
di 457655676
12 commenti
“The campaign recasts surveillance as safety”
How many freedoms have been lost under the promise of a safer world?
meanwhile criminals will just send pgp encrypted txt, and manually decrypt it.
AI could probably help build an app to do it too, auto copy and paste from your fav app.
They’re not even trying to hide it. Anyone remotely technically minded knows there’s a million and one ways around anything they propose, they’re not even bothering with the arguments anymore. Just naked censorship and surveillance these days.
1) They fundamentally misunderstand how the tech works.
2) This is already in place for a large amount of apps, including Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, etc.
This has been in place already for many years.
> proposal that would make every private message pass through a local checkpoint before being sent.
That’s not how it works.
The image is scanned and hashed.
The HASH is sent and compared against a list of known CSAM.
At no point is your message sent to a third party waiting to be cleared.
> And once the scanning infrastructure is built, there is nothing stopping it from being redirected toward new categories of “harmful” or “illegal” content. The precedent would be set: your phone would no longer be a private space.
Again, this has been in place for many years.
Show me where it has affected anyone already.
Start by scanning the messages of all MPs and police then.
at what point as a country so we just accept we’re run by clowns and the best thing we can do is sing kumbaya, hand in hand, on the white cliffs of Dover
> Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips praised the IWF campaign, saying: “It is clear that the British public want greater protections for children online and we are working with technology companies so more can be done to keep children safer.
Errr I think the majority of people see your online safety act and the “think of the children” excuses as complete BS
This the same Jess Phillips that voted against an inquiry into the grooming gangs and then was accused of trying to derail/ readjust the focus of said inquiry. That Jess Phillips?
After the fourteen long, barren years of Tory rule the last thing we needed was a more authoritarian centre-right party. Alas.
Meanwhile in EU:
> If regular scanning proved impossible, governments could order companies to install client-side scanning, software that inspects messages on the user’s own device before encryption.
> The backlash was instant. Legal experts warned that the **plan violated Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights**, which guarantee privacy and data protection.
Don’t we have in our laws as well?
They’re just laying the foundations to enlist one large government controlled AI overwatch.
That’s what all this stuff is leading up to. The AI will make sure we pesky humans are behaving once it can access all of our privacy.
Not a conspiracy.
What does it do if it finds a match, just block it or send it somewhere for review?
The former at least preserves privacy though has free speech problems, the latter will cause the inevitable false matches to trigger major privacy breaches.