La Corte UE stabilisce che le bevande analcoliche non possono essere chiamate gin

>The makers of spirits may be raising a toast to the European judges of Luxembourg after the EU’s court ruled that non-alcoholic drinks cannot be called gin.

>Only spirit drinks based on ethyl alcohol flavoured by juniper berries with a minimum alcoholic strength of 37.5% by volume can be known as gin, the court said in a judgment issued on Thursday.

>The case was brought by a German association against unfair competition, Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb, against PB Vi Goods, a company that sold a drink called Virgin Gin Alkoholfrei.

>The company argued in court that it was obvious from the name that it was selling a non-alcoholic drink. A court in Germany also considered that the name “eliminates the risk of misleading the consumer” and raised the question that European regulation on spirits could be at odds with the freedom to conduct a business under the EU’s charter of fundamental rights.

>But the Luxembourg judges said EU law was clear that the term “non-alcoholic gin” was prohibited. “The fact that the legal name ‘gin’ is accompanied by the term ‘non-alcoholic’ is irrelevant,” the court said.

>The 2019 EU regulation states that such provisions protect consumers, prevent deceptive practices, ensure fair competition and safeguard the international reputation of the EU’s spirit drinks.

>The ruling could be a setback to the EU’s fast-growing alcohol-free drinks industry. PB Vi Goods did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment on Thursday.

>It is not the first time that some of the EU’s top legal minds have been asked to grapple with the names and shapes of food and drink, whether indulgences or everyday staples.

>In 2018, the ECJ ruled that the makers of KitKats could not trademark the four-fingered wafer shape, ending a decade-long legal battle between chocolate makers over what one court adviser called the “four trapezoidal bars aligned on a rectangular base”.

>The previous year, the court ruled that only animal-derived products could use names such as milk, butter, cream and yogurt.

>The European parliament is seeking to tighten up food labelling rules further: last month it voted to outlaw terms such as burger and sausage for plant-based foods.

>The law is still being negotiated with EU member states, who may yet save veggie burgers and tofu steaks. But for now, an alcohol-free gin and tonic is officially off the menu in the EU.

honestly makes sense you cant just slap any name on a product when the whole point is that it doesnt contain the main ingredient

For the people wondering “does the EUCJ has nothing better to do?”, “is it the fake meat ruling all over again”, etc…

Those decisions, while not very existential, are important. They’re meant, among other things, to protect consumers.

If we start allowing the industry to call anything everything, next tuesday Coca Cola will start selling black “mineral water” and Nutella to pretend they’re selling fruit paste. Words have meaning. And half of the general population has an IQ under the median. If the government (or medical doctor) says “you should eat more fruit” and you have salt labelled “mineral fruit” in the supermarkets, there will be strange consequences. Purely hypothetically: imagine if the industry was trying to sell you cereal production waste boosted with sugar and fats as “meat”… Nobody would fall for that, right? Well guess again. So I assure you the “Nutella is a fruit” analogy isn’t far away.