Share.

    16 commenti

    1. RockinMadRiot on

      Someone with a bit more legal brains than me, will he have a case? Because I don’t believe suing law work the same here and there.

    2. Valcenia on

      Between invading Venezuela and now this, he’s really pulling out all the stops to distract from the fact he sucked Bill Clinton’s dick, huh

    3. Necessary-Product361 on

      The leader of our “closest ally” whom we have a “special relationship” apparently.

    4. MisterIndecisive on

      Starmer has handled Trump well up until now, but this will be a real if test if he can get him to get a grip.

    5. FrenulumFungi on

      We’ll, good luck to him! I don’t know how you can sue for defamation from abroad when you’re a paedo cunt who’s actively overthrowing democracy in his own country for saying you’re a cunt and overthrowing democracy, no matter how much the Beeb fucked up on this.

    6. Naive_Ambition1306 on

      I really don’t understand why they edited the speech in that way though, they could literally have played hundreds of Trump clips to show how he his. Why lie at all?

    7. forgottenendeavours on

      I wish it wasn’t Trump doing this, but it’s just so, so lovely to see the BBC at the receiving end of threatening letters and demands for money for once. I hope their senior directors now feel what my elderly neighbour felt.

    8. Darkhallows27 on

      What’s that Donny? We can’t hear you over Big, Beautiful Bill’s bulging balls

    9. Critical_Honking420 on

      Good. Hopefully he can threaten them with visits to investigate the BBC’s continued use of his likeness and threaten them into paying him whether he has a right to or not.

    10. ScoobyCat4 on

      As one of millions of TV licence holders who funds the BBC, a shareholder effectively, he’s getting f@ck all from me… let’s see this narcissistic fascist man baby in court.. He can come and knock on every door in the U.K. for his money..

      The BBC should tell him a) F*ck off and b) Grow Up and publish a full page rebuttal in every US newspaper. It should then set loose its best investigative journalist to put this nut job under the scrutiny the US press should have done a long time ago..

    11. I don’t watch the BBC but if this helps gets rid of the licence fee even the BBC itself I don’t think I’ll be shedding a tear

    12. Spamgrenade on

      Good luck to Trump, I watched that documentary when it aired. The quotes were right at the start, used as a dramatic opening and pretty obviously an edit. At no point in the actual show was it claimed he said words in that order.

      In hindsight a bad move from the BBC but no way could you say they intended to put words into Trumps mouth.

    13. McFlyJohn on

      As said in another thread. Huge fuck up by the BBC, absolutely glaring incompetence and people rightfully deserve to be resigning and getting sacked over it. Apology was also warranted

      But, what damages does he have? He won the next election. He’s legit the President, the doc clearly did not dissuade people from voting for him, nor did he face criminal charges over the event.

      Obviously this is all posturing though anyway.

    14. darkmatters2501 on

      Wait didn’t he say he eoukd not sue if the bbc posted a retraction ?

      Which they did now he is sueing?

      Looks like he can’t keep his word.

    15. NoGloryForEngland on

      IANAL but to my mind (correct me if I’m wrong as long as you’re not a right wing cretin) he doesn’t win in court if he can’t come at them another way. He has regulatory powers that he can fuck over US broadcasters with so they sometimes capitulate but he has no such influence on a UK broadcaster.

      UK courts won’t entertain his bullshit and he is a nightmare client with a history of non-payment so he won’t get competent counsel for an international punitive damages claim.

      I personally won’t ever pay a penny of a license fee ever again if he gets half as much from them, he’s suing over an edit but he absolutely cajoled and manipulated his fat necked, moronic supporters into an insurrection regardless of how it was presented on Panorama.

      Get to fuck, you absolute parasitic, paedophile bitch.

    16. Doowrednu on

      I am confused how he can actually do this from a legal standpoint. Can someone explain ?

      Would love to see him in our courts just for the spectacle alone.

    Leave A Reply