Il Congresso degli Stati Uniti è improbabile che sostenga un’invasione della Groenlandia, dice il top democratico

    https://www.reuters.com/world/denmark-has-been-tremendous-ally-top-us-democrat-jeffries-says-2025-04-25/

    di AdSpecialist6598

    Share.

    28 commenti

    1. TailleventCH on

      If asked before but that’s what fait accompli is for.

    2. Dystopics_IT on

      “unlikely” seems a mild statement for a completely crazy idea

    3. DuaLipaMePippa on

      Having the word “unlikely” in this conversation is really psychedelic, to be honest. In a normal world, you would expect them to 100% disregard this talk , but then again, they’re not really normal.

    4. “unlikely to back invasion”, says parliament chamber minority, now that’s some decisive leadership. Thanks guys!

    5. The problem is the US Congress relinquished too much power to the executive branch since wwii. US presidents can easily basically wage wars now without Congressional approval as long as they don’t call it a war. 

    6. kobold_komrade on

      That’s hilarious to think they will have a say in the matter. The Constitution is more like suggestions these days.

    7. longsgotschlongs on

      Unlikely – so there’s still a possibility? What a fucking bunch of wankers

    8. darknekolux on

      I totally trust the US congress to contain the orange turd /s

    9. SenatorPardek on

      I feel like anytime i go out in a limb to defend democrats someone says something like this that shows that outside of a few key figures (like booker and aoc) they don’t really understand the seriousness of the historical moment. Like they will freak out in fundraising emails but they don’t really see us “actually” in the early stages of a full fascist takeover

    10. just_a_floor1991 on

      “Unlikely” god I hate being an American sometimes. I stand with and support the European Union.

    11. International-Face93 on

      Both chambers of congress is currently controlled by the Republican party (Trump’s party). They say unlikely, because they are unsure if Republican’s in congress would cave to pressure and support the invasion. This statement was made by a Democrat. The subtext is, “There is mo way in hell my party would support this, but we can only HOPE that the other side has dignity enough to tell Trump No.”

    12. Kaya_kana on

      Clearly, if announced today it seems unlikely. But what about in 3 years?

    13. critiqueextension on

      The idea of a US invasion of Greenland is highly unlikely, with congressional support for such action being virtually nonexistent, and recent discussions focus more on strategic interests and negotiations rather than invasion plans. Greenland’s geopolitical importance is recognized, but current US policy emphasizes diplomacy and potential acquisition through negotiations rather than military force.

      * [Congress won’t back a Trump invasion of Greenland, top Democrat …](https://www.yahoo.com/news/congress-wont-back-trump-invasion-170533005.html)
      * [US Congress Unlikely To Back Forceful Trump Move On Greenland](https://stratnewsglobal.com/world-news/u-s-congress-unlikely-to-back-forceful-trump-move-on-greenland/)

      ^(This is a bot made by [Critique AI](https://critique-labs.ai). If you want vetted information like this on all content you browse, [download our extension](https://critiquebrowser.app).)

    14. Significant_Sea_32 on

      In case they do just build naval fortifications in nuuk and station a couple of garrisons there , does the trick in hoi4

    15. Delicious_Leopard_13 on

      And nowhere in his remarks did Jeffries use the word “ unlikely”

    16. RelevanceReverence on

      Not “unlikely” if the DoD and the DoJ leadership is compromised. Which they are!

    17. absurdherowaw on

      “Unlikely”. Jesus, this proves Democracts are simply as complicit as Republicans and we cannot trust neither.

    18. anders_hansson on

      Please take note: They are still talking about it like it’s a legitimate thing to discuss in the US Congress.

      This is how you make your population familiar with the idea.

    19. jaywastaken on

      Unlikely is terrifyingly weak language for the prospect of INVADING A EUROPEAN ALLY!

    20. ExternalSpecific4042 on

      “I don’t believe that there is real bipartisan support in the Congress to aggressively move on Greenland,” Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, the leader of the Democrats in the House of Representatives, told reporters on April 25 during a visit by members of Congress.”

      Sounds like he is Trying to be Obama part two. “Bipartisan”.

      He and His party leaders are still pretending that things are normal in America.

    21. Not_Cleaver on

      We haven’t had an actual declaration of war since Korea. So, the president could act with relative impunity and there’s little Congress could do until after the fact.

      If the headline isn’t vehemently opposed and would impeach/remove Trump, it’s meaningless.

    22. PyronixD on

      In OSINT terminology, ‘unlikely’ indicates a probability in the range of 25-35%.
      This is way too high for a supposed ally.

    23. CaraDune01 on

      “Unlikely”? Guys, come on. How about “absolutely the fuck not?”

    Leave A Reply