Varsavia respinge il piano di ricollocazione dei migranti dell’UE, dice il presidente polacco a von der Leyen

Also the Ukrainian refugees don’t count in that relocation plan lmao.

Because when you aren’t a former colonial power which turned their colonies into shit and now are reaping consequences of that- then I guess fuck you you have to suffer consequences too lmao.

European nations which never colonized Africa and were often subject of colonization from other European states are now supposed to bear consequences of others oppression- How is that fair?

Why am I reading so much about polands president?

I thought the PM is the guy with power or is it like in France where the president has powers for foreign politics or is this just because hes new in office?

The idea of destributing migrants across the continent makes no sense. The Migrants they talk about typically aren’t headed for Poland in the first place. If they are moved to Poland they will simply leave and go where they want to go.

Stop allowing illegal immigration Europe! Wake UP! Don’t be stupíd.

kick the leeches out, we must go back to the initial core.

This is still up for discussion? We still in 2015/2016 trying to make this plan no one actually wants work?

That “solidarity framework” is only one part of the new migration and asylym pact though, that Nawrocki is talking about.

The pact also includes toughening external borders and frontex, creating an EU wide “Eurodac” database that identifies and keeps track of all asylym seekers and migrants, increasing cooperation with source/north african countries’ own border guards, and a creation of “fast-track” procedures intented to make asylum desicion and deportation significantly faster, for example.

That solidarity framework is only one part of it, and yes, maybe the most controversial in some countries. There were procedures negotiated that would allow paying financial sums instead of taking refugees through the framework though.

But it’s false image that the pact would make migration easier that some seem to have – it would actually toughen it. VdL’s Commission has even talked about external asylym processing centres outside EU, but that’s not part of this plan.

I personally identify 3 issues with migration:

1)UN 1951 refugee convention, that forms the basic of legislation about refugees, doesn’t really take into account the large wealth differences between countries and how this pushes migration. So large share of migrants coming into the system are ultimately refused refugee status. This pact was written in 1951, after WW2, where lots of people died because they were turned away at border. Refugee convention requires the migrants and their asylym request to be legally processed.

2)Processing of asylym seekers takes too long.

3)Deportation of migrants whose asylym request is denied, is often very hard. Some countries don’t want to take them back, and this is one reason that makes it hard.

EU’s new migration pact would have some solutions to all these three issues. Except first one, except in some special circumstances. Make asylym process and possible deportation faster. “Solidarity framework” part of it is probably because some (especially southern european) countries feel that it’s unfair that they have to face so much of the burden, that’s a fair point in itself.

So when many people in this comment section talk about “illegal migration”, it’s kind of contradictory, because the laws we ourself wrote, creates the requirement to process asylym requests.

And it’s quite interesting that most effective way so far has been increasing cooperation with north african countries (and also Turkey). EU has deals with all of them, and in those deals, EU provides funding, and those states forcefully turn back migrants and arrest human smugglers in north africa. This has also caused some critisism, as those methods are sometimes rough.

So the current situation is that EU pays northern african countries, to use all methods, even lots of force, to turn away migrants, but if the migrants get into europe, it gets into lengthy asylym process, and can’t be turned away at border. Honestly, it doesn’t make sense. It is legal, but it doesn’t make sense. It’s not really fair either, as people who get inside into asylym process aren’t probably those most in need; large amount are young men who’s family has paid money to human smugglers.

Only conclusion I can get is that 1951 refugee convention is outdated.