Just some of the figures included in that article.
Only towns with in excess of 2,000 people are required to have wastewater collection systems in place and must undergo secondary treatment before discharge.
Only towns with in excess of 10,000 people are required to have treatments in place to remove nitrates and phosphorus from their wastewater.
So, if I’m reading that correctly, towns of under 10,000 people aren’t required to remove excess nitrates and phosphorus and towns under 2,000 people aren’t required to have pretty much any treatment at all?
LengthinessFlat2379 on
Hmm, 3 year nitrate derogation is sure to help.
zeroconflicthere on
Remember when people prepared because they don’t want to pay for water…
Sure, general taxation should take care of it.
While we’re at it, Why can’t our general taxation take care of the exact same use cases where we get electricity and heat sources to they home just like water?
4 commenti
Well we had it coming. There’s taking the piss…
Just some of the figures included in that article.
Only towns with in excess of 2,000 people are required to have wastewater collection systems in place and must undergo secondary treatment before discharge.
Only towns with in excess of 10,000 people are required to have treatments in place to remove nitrates and phosphorus from their wastewater.
So, if I’m reading that correctly, towns of under 10,000 people aren’t required to remove excess nitrates and phosphorus and towns under 2,000 people aren’t required to have pretty much any treatment at all?
Hmm, 3 year nitrate derogation is sure to help.
Remember when people prepared because they don’t want to pay for water…
Sure, general taxation should take care of it.
While we’re at it, Why can’t our general taxation take care of the exact same use cases where we get electricity and heat sources to they home just like water?