Share.

26 commenti

  1. Adventurous-Tax512 on

    Considering our lack of forestation in the first place +3.6% isn’t a lot of trees

  2. Useful_Engineer_1792 on

    I wonder did they filter out the sika etc?
    Also what’s +3.2% of next to nothing?

  3. Spare-Buy-8864 on

    Clear fell timber plantations are no more “forests” than a wheat farm is grassland

    In reality we have no forests of any size at all in this country, a few small pockets of a few hectares scattered here and there but nothing that can sustain any sort of real natural habitat

  4. yes_its_me_alright on

    Just back from Australia, was chatting to the receptionist at the hotel, I asked him was he ever in Ireland. He said he was for a 2 week holiday last year. I asked him if he liked Ireland and his response was “why are there no trees in Ireland, I couldn’t believe the lack of trees, nowhere to be seen only fields”

  5. Clean-Ball-1371 on

    It’s fairly easy to swiftly get big gains from a starting point of sweet fuck all.

  6. GrouchyCustomer6050 on

    You mean waxing isint as popular as it once was?

  7. HugoZHackenbush2 on

    Those figures are very misleading. Coillte, in my opinion, still can’t see the wood for the trees..

  8. SnooChickens1534 on

    If thats non native spruce forestry, then it shouldn’t count

  9. Garth8888 on

    Good to see Coolmore getting pulled up in Clonmel Court for replacing natural hedges with pretty ones.

  10. Apprehensive_Ratio80 on

    Am surprised at this we seem to have no forests at all these days.

  11. The word “timber” in the graph suggests these forests are commercial trees planted equidistantly in a grid pattern and explode upwards blotting out all the light until they’re tall enough to be harvested. Such forests aren’t much good for biodiversity because its a mono culture and there is little undergrowth or wildlife to speak of.

    A better metric would be actual re-forestation where native species of various kinds (trees, bushes, plants) are planted with the intent of establishing permanent woodlands and biodiversity.

    I’m sure there is also a middle ground where there can be some commercial planting in a diverse native habitat providing that trees are felled and replaced in a sustainable way.

  12. theoldkitbag on

    Our percentage is so low, I could plant a tree in the morning and it would raise it.

  13. GarlicGlobal2311 on

    Its the quality of said forest that matters to me.

    We aren’t growing natural forests, and the forests we do grow collite is selling out from under us to keep itself alive

  14. Key_Duck_6293 on

    Ireland coming from an embarrassingly low point compared to most, and most of this growth isn’t forests, its plantations that do next to nothing for biodiversity or carbon capture

  15. bobbyg1234 on

    All of our national parks are fragmented and poorly maintained, we are embarrisingly far behind Scotland and England on actual woodland conservation. 

    This figure means nothing. 3.6% of fuck all

  16. LegionGold on

    Denmark beating us again, one of these days we’ll get them!

  17. FakeNewsMessiah on

    Timber = trees

    ![gif](giphy|a5viI92PAF89q)

    So does my kitchen table still count as a tree?

  18. Fluffy-Republic8610 on

    We suffered from a cultural problem for centuries. Esp after the famine. It was almost sinful to leave any land in your control “unproductive”. You’d get comments. People might think you were “lazy”.

    And that resulted in every patch of Ireland being converted into a field below a certain altitude.

    And now we are only beginning to wake up. Most people get to the top of a hill and look down over a landscape full of fields and think “ahh, isn’t nature beautiful” when in fact they are looking at a man made apocalypse.

  19. What type of trees though? Sitka spruce for timber isn’t exactly a plus. Not native trees on the other hand is.

Leave A Reply